jlh: Chibi of me in an apron with a cocktail glass and shaker. (Clio Chibi)
[personal profile] jlh
I'm using my chibi icon—it's a chibi of me, drawn by [livejournal.com profile] bhanesidhe—because I'm going to talk about race for a moment, so it's fair to say, I identify as biracial, or in somewhat ironic moods a "tragic mulatto". (Great thanks, as KO would say, to Carrie for letting me use her as an example.)

So as some of you may know there was this whole race kerfuffle in the SGA fandom—go look through back issues of [livejournal.com profile] metafandom if you want to see it in action, as it went on too long and had too many feelers all over the place for me to recount here. But in the midst of all the debate, there were claims by some folks that they are "color blind."

You know who claims he's "color blind", or says, "I don't see color"? Stephen Colbert's character on The Colbert Report, who's a satire of far-right news hosts. So right there is an inkling that the term "color blind" isn't really the best "I'm not racist" statement.

Here's a parallel. My good friend [livejournal.com profile] wordplay grew up in Texas, lived there much of her life. She has a really great accent, too; go listen to her phone posts. Anyway, when I think about Carrie I don't think, "Oh, I don't think of her as southern." Of course I think of her as a southerner; it's part of who she is. If I see something that is saying something about the South that she might find interesting I send her a link. (And when she sees things about race in fandom, she'll send me the link—I was aware of the SGA thing from the start because she's in SGA and sent me the link to the original post that started the whole thing.) What I don't do is think of her necessarily as any of a bunch of loaded stereotypes about southerners, like, I don't know, that she's not well educated or backwards in her thinking or a big racist or whatever. Or, for that matter, think of her as any of the more positive stereotypes like that she's more ladylike or whatever. I don't have to think of her as not-southern in order to think of her as just, well, a person.

In plainer language, if you "just don't think of Clio as black" that's disrespectful, because I am, and you shouldn't have to deny my race in order to see me as a person just like you. In his famous speech Dr. King said he didn't want people to be judged by the color of their skin, but he didn't say that he wanted everyone to forget about it. You can move beyond being essentialist—thinking that all black folks, or whateverelse folks, are the same in certain ways—without leaving race behind. Race matters, in both good ways and bad ways, and deciding that it means nothing to you isn't actually moving the conversation forward.

And it's tough for everyone! It isn't about guilt, but about knowledge. We all have stereotypes in our heads, picked up from living in our culture, and we all have to fight against them. I definitely have my heteronormative moments, my times of forgetting about simple things I could do to be more understanding of people with disabilities, and hell, my own racist moments. When it's pointed out to me I stop and think, apologize if necessary, and move on with more knowledge than I had before. Oprah has this saying, that you do the best you can with what you know, and when you know better, you do better. So, now you know.

Date: 2007-05-07 05:40 pm (UTC)
ext_6866: (Default)
From: [identity profile] sistermagpie.livejournal.com
I remember having a conversation sort of about this once, about how on the 'net you don't automatically know anything about a person. I just remember thinking how I didn't always think that was a good thing--I liked it when people spoke about who they were in this situation where I didn't have to know. Meaning they said what race they were, or if they had a disability. Because otherwise I *know* I'm going to default to making the person the same as me because that's my default. The thing that was really better about the Internet was the way you could both separate the person and not separate them--meaning that maybe not *seeing* the person made it easier to not make whatever associations you might make to them if you were seeing them. (Like, if they had a disability you wouldn't unconsciously be focusing on that because on the 'net they're just as abled as you are.) But at the same time it also told you hey, this person you're interacting with equally? Is also not like you in this way. So you get used to those two things at once and are maybe less likely to think that, for instance, a world without racism is a world where everyone's white so you don't have to think about it etc. At times I've felt like it gives you a totally different perspective on what makes up an identity--for instance, if you're talking to someone in a medium in which not hearing is never an issue, and yet the person is still identifying and is still identified as deaf, showing that it goes beyond just the lack of hearing or stereotypes.

Date: 2007-05-12 05:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jlh.livejournal.com
And identity is so slippery anyway, so contingent really, and ever changing and all of that sort of thing. Like, how you might choose to identify yourself v how others identify you and what that means and etc. So then you wonder how much any of these things matter and I would say, they matter in that you don't forget them, and then that's sort of it. If that makes any sense!

Profile

jlh: Chibi of me in an apron with a cocktail glass and shaker. (Default)
Clio, a vibrating mass of YES!

October 2021

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
171819202122 23
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 28th, 2026 04:47 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios